IRC Info

irc

Server: irc.dab.biz port: 6667 (SSL 6697)

/j #shellmix

Hypeshell.com

New shell server
 
 
The new server is like shellmix, but to register you have to pay 5 Euro. You only pay once. This is the only way to stop idiots and spammers.
Server features :

- Two Intel i7 CPU 2600K

- 16 GB DDR3

- Four HDD SATA3

- Separate Environment between user class

- Many IP

 - And everything looks like shellmix : )

 



Search

Comments Latest

  • Hi getting a "Server unexpectedly closed network c...
  • Great server, but tunnel is not working... :|
  • Looks like whoever installed putty on the computer...
  • Can't log into the ssh server to create a new acco...
  • I would like to help resolve this issue.

Advertising

Advertising

Shell script Tutorial 1

Attention: open in a new window. Print

1. Introduction

Purpose Of This Tutorial

This tutorial is written to help people understand some of the basics of shell script programming, and hopefully to introduce some of the possibilities of simple but powerful programming available under the bourne shell. As such, it has been written as a basis for one-on-one or group tutorials and exercises, and as a reference for subsequent use.

Getting The Most Recent Version Of This Tutorial

The most recent version of this tutorial is available from: http://steve-parker.org/sh/sh.shtml. Always check there for the latest copy.

A Brief History of sh

Steve Bourne, wrote the Bourne shell which appeared in the Seventh Edition Bell Labs Research version of Unix.
Many other shells have been written; this particular tutorial concentrates on the Bourne and the Bourne Again shells.
Other shells include the Korn Shell (ksh), the C Shell (csh), and variations such as tcsh.
This tutorial does not cover those shells. Maybe a future version will cover ksh; I do not intend to write a tutorial for csh, as csh programming is considered harmful.

Audience

This tutorial assumes some prior experience; namely:
  • Use of an interactive Unix shell
  • Minimal programming knowledge - use of variables, functions, is useful background knowledge
  • Understanding of how Unix commands are structured, and competence in using some of the more common ones.
  • Programmers of perl, python, C, Pascal, or any programming language (even BASIC) who can maybe read shell scripts, but don't feel they understand exactly how they work.

Typographical Conventions Used in This Tutorial

Significant words will be written in italics when mentioned for the first time.

Code segments and script output will be displayed as preformatted text.
Command-line entries will be preceded by the Dollar sign ($). If your prompt is different, enter the command:

PS1="$ " ; export PS1

Then your interactions should match the examples given (such as $ ./my-script.sh below).
Script output (such as "Hello World" below) is displayed at the start of the line.

$ echo '#!/bin/sh' > my-script.sh
$ echo 'echo Hello World' >> my-script.sh
$ chmod 755 my-script.sh
$ ./my-script.sh
Hello World
$
Entire scripts will be surrounded by thick horizontal rules and include a reference where available to the plain text of the script:
first.sh
#!/bin/sh
# This is a comment!
echo Hello World        # This is a comment, too!

Note that to make a file executable, you must set the eXecutable bit, and for a shell script, the Readable bit must also be set:

$ chmod a+rx first.sh


 

2. Philosophy

Shell script programming has a bit of a bad press amongst some Unix systems administrators. This is normally because of one of two things:

  • The speed at which an interpreted program will run as compared to a C program, or even an interpreted Perl program.
  • Since it is easy to write a simple batch-job type shell script, there are a lot of poor quality shell scripts around.

It is partly due to this that there is a certain machismo associated with creating good shell scripts. Scripts which can be used as CGI programs, for example, without losing out too much in speed to Perl (though both would lose to C, in many cases, were speed the only criterion).
There are a number of factors which can go into good, clean, quick, shell scripts.

  • The most important criteria must be a clear, readable layout.
  • Second is avoiding unnecessary commands.

A clear layout makes the difference between a shell script appearing as "black magic" and one which is easily maintained and understood.
You may be forgiven for thinking that with a simple script, this is not too significant a problem, but two things here are worth bearing in mind.

  1. First, a simple script will, more often than anticipated, grow into a large, complex one.
  2. Secondly, if nobody else can understand how it works, you will be lumbered with maintaining it yourself for the rest of your life!

Something about shell scripts seems to make them particularly likely to be badly indented, and since the main control structures are if/then/else and loops, indentation is critical for understanding what a script does.

One of the major weaknesses in many shell scripts is lines such as:

cat /tmp/myfile | grep "mystring"

which would run much faster as:

grep "mystring" /tmp/myfile

Not much, you may consider; the OS has to load up the /bin/grep executable, which is a reasonably small 75600 bytes on my system, open a pipe in memory for the transfer, load and run the /bin/cat executable, which is an even smaller 9528 bytes on my system, attach it to the input of the pipe, and let it run.
Of course, this kind of thing is what the OS is there for, and it's normally pretty efficient at doing it. But if this command were in a loop being run many times over, the saving of not locating and loading the cat executable, setting up and releasing the pipe, can make some difference, especially in, say, a CGI environment where there are enough other factors to slow things down without the script itself being too much of a hurdle. Some Unices are more efficient than others at what they call "building up and tearing down processes" - ie, loading them up, executing them, and clearing them away again. But however good your flavour of Unix is at doing this, it'd rather not have to do it at all.

As a result of this, you may hear mention of the Useless Use of Cat Award (UUoC), also known in some circles as The Award For The Most Gratuitous Use Of The Word Cat In A Serious Shell Script being bandied about on the comp.unix.shell newsgroup from time to time. This is purely a way of peers keeping each other in check, and making sure that things are done right.

Speaking of which, I would like to recommend the comp.os.unix.shell newsgroup to you, although its signal to noise ratio seems to have decreased in recent years. There are still some real gurus who hang out there with good advice for those of us who need to know more (and that's all of us!). Sharing experiences is the key to all of this - the reason behind this tutorial itself, and we can all learn from and contribute to open discussions about such issues.
Which leads me nicely on to something else: Don't ever feel too close to your own shell scripts; by their nature, the source cannot be closed. If you supply a customer with a shell script, s/he can inspect it quite easily. So you might as well accept that it will be inspected by anyone you pass it to; use this to your advantage with the GPL - encourage people to give you feedback and bugfixes for free!

3. A First Script

For our first shell script, we'll just write a script which says "Hello World". We will then try to get more out of a Hello World program than any other tutorial you've ever read :-)
Create a file (first.sh) as follows:


first.sh
#!/bin/sh
# This is a comment!
echo Hello World        # This is a comment, too!

The first line tells Unix that the file is to be executed by /bin/sh. This is the standard location of the Bourne shell on just about every Unix system. If you're using GNU/Linux, /bin/sh is normally a symbolic link to bash.

The second line begins with a special symbol: #. This marks the line as a comment, and it is ignored completely by the shell.
The only exception is when the very first line of the file starts with #! - as ours does. This is a special directive which Unix treats specially. It means that even if you are using csh, ksh, or anything else as your interactive shell, that what follows should be interpreted by the Bourne shell.
Similarly, a Perl script may start with the line #!/usr/bin/perl to tell your interactive shell that the program which follows should be executed by perl. For Bourne shell programming, we shall stick to #!/bin/sh.

The third line runs a command: echo, with two parameters, or arguments - the first is "Hello"; the second is "World".
Note that echo will automatically put a single space between its parameters.
The # symbol still marks a comment; the # and anything following it is ignored by the shell.

now run chmod 755 first.sh to make the text file executable, and run ./first.sh.
Your screen should then look like this:

$ chmod 755 first.sh
$ ./first.sh
Hello World
$

You will probably have expected that! You could even just run:

$ echo Hello World
Hello World
$

Now let's make a few changes.
First, note that echo puts ONE space between its parameters. Put a few spaces between "Hello" and "World". What do you expect the output to be? What about putting a TAB character between them?
As always with shell programming, try it and see.
The output is exactly the same! We are calling the echo program with two arguments; it doesn't care any more than cp does about the gaps in between them.

Now modify the code again:

#!/bin/sh
# This is a comment!
echo "Hello      World"       # This is a comment, too!

This time it works. You probably expected that, too, if you have experience of other programming languages. But the key to understanding what is going on with more complex command and shell script, is to understand and be able to explain: WHY?
echo has now been called with just ONE argument - the string "Hello    World". It prints this out exactly.
The point to understand here is that the shell parses the arguments BEFORE passing them on to the program being called. In this case, it strips the quotes but passes the string as one argument.
As a final example, type in the following script. Try to predict the outcome before you run it:


first2.sh
#!/bin/sh
# This is a comment!
echo "Hello      World"       # This is a comment, too!
echo "Hello World"
echo "Hello * World"
echo Hello * World
echo Hello      World
echo "Hello" World
echo Hello "     " World
echo "Hello \"*\" World"
echo `hello` world
echo 'hello' world

Is everything as you expected? If not, don't worry! These are just some of the things we will be covering in this tutorial ... and yes, we will be using more powerful commands than echo!

4. Variables - Part I

Just about every programming language in existence has the concept of variables - a symbolic name for a chunk of memory to which we can assign values, read and manipulate its contents. The bourne shell is no exception, and this section introduces this idea. This is taken further in Variables - Part II which looks into variables which are set for us by the environment.
Let's look back at our first Hello World example. This could be done using variables (though it's such a simple example that it doesn't really warrant it!)
Note that there must be no spaces around the "=" sign: VAR=value works; VAR = value doesn't work. In the first case, the shell sees the "=" symbol and treats the command as a variable assignment. In the second case, the shell assumes that VAR must be the name of a command and tries to execute it.
If you think about it, this makes sense - how else could you tell it to run the command VAR with its first argument being "=" and its second argument being "value"?
Enter the following code into var1.sh:


var.sh
#!/bin/sh
MY_MESSAGE="Hello World"
echo $MY_MESSAGE

This assigns the string "Hello World" to the variable MY_MESSAGE then echoes out the value of the variable.
Note that we need the quotes around the string Hello World. Whereas we could get away with echo Hello World because echo will take any number of parameters, a variable can only hold one value, so a string with spaces must be quoted to that the shell knows to treat it all as one. Otherwise, the shell will try to execute the command World after assigning MY_MESSAGE=Hello

The shell does not care about types of variables; they may store strings, integers, real numbers - anything you like.
People used to Perl may be quite happy with this; if you've grown up with C, Pascal, or worse yet Ada, this may seem quite strange.
In truth, these are all stored as strings, but routines which expect a number can treat them as such.
If you assign a string to a variable then try to add 1 to it, you will not get away with it:

$ x="hello"
$ y=`expr $x + 1`
expr: non-numeric argument
$

Since the external program expr only expects numbers. But there is no syntactic difference between:

MY_MESSAGE="Hello World"
MY_SHORT_MESSAGE=hi
MY_NUMBER=1
MY_PI=3.142
MY_OTHER_PI="3.142"
MY_MIXED=123abc

Note though that special characters must be properly escaped to avoid interpretation by the shell.
This is discussed further in Escape Characters.

We can interactively set variable names using the read command; the following script asks you for your name then greets you personally:


var2.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo What is your name?
read MY_NAME
echo "Hello $MY_NAME - hope you're well."

Mario Bacinsky kindly pointed out to me that I had originally missed out the double-quotes in line 3, which meant that the single-quote in the word "you're" was unmatched, causing an error. It is this kind of thing which can drive a shell programmer crazy, so watch out for them!


This is using the shell-builtin command read which reads a line from standard input into the variable supplied.
Note that even if you give it your full name and don't use double quotes around the echo command, it still outputs correctly. How is this done? With the MY_MESSAGE variable earlier we had to put double quotes around it to set it.
What happens, is that the read command automatically places quotes around its input, so that spaces are treated correctly. (You will need to quote the output, of course - e.g. echo "$MY_MESSAGE").

Scope of Variables

Variables in the bourne shell do not have to be declared, as they do in languages like C. But if you try to read an undeclared variable, the result is the empty string. You get no warnings or errors. This can cause some subtle bugs - if you assign MY_OBFUSCATED_VARIABLE=Hello and then echo $MY_OSFUCATED_VARIABLE, you will get nothing (as the second OBFUSCATED is mis-spelled).

There is a command called export which has a fundamental effect on the scope of variables. In order to really know what's going on with your variables, you will need to understand something about how this is used.

Create a small shell script, myvar2.sh:


myvar2.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo "MYVAR is: $MYVAR"
MYVAR="hi there"
echo "MYVAR is: $MYVAR"

Now run the script:

$ ./myvar2.sh
MYVAR is:
MYVAR is: hi there

MYVAR hasn't been set to any value, so it's blank. Then we give it a value, and it has the expected result.
Now run:

$ MYVAR=hello
$ ./myvar2.sh
MYVAR is:
MYVAR is: hi there

It's still not been set! What's going on?!
When you call myvar2.sh from your interactive shell, a new shell is spawned to run the script. This is partly because of the #!/bin/sh line at the start of the script, which we discussed earlier.
We need to export the variable for it to be inherited by another program - including a shell script. Type:

$ export MYVAR
$ ./myvar2.sh
MYVAR is: hello
MYVAR is: hi there

Now look at line 3 of the script: this is changing the value of MYVAR. But there is no way that this will be passed back to your interactive shell. Try reading the value of MYVAR:

$ echo $MYVAR
hello
$

Once the shell script exits, its environment is destroyed. But MYVAR keeps its value of hello within your interactive shell.
In order to receive environment changes back from the script, we must source the script - this effectively runs the script within our own interactive shell, instead of spawning another shell to run it.
We can source a script via the "." command:

$ MYVAR=hello
$ echo $MYVAR
hello
$ . ./myvar2.sh
MYVAR is: hello
MYVAR is: hi there
$ echo $MYVAR
hi there

The change has now made it out into our shell again! This is how your .profile or .bash_profile file works, for example.
Note that in this case, we don't need to export MYVAR.
Thanks to sway for pointing out that I'd originally said echo MYVAR above, not echo $MYVAR as it should be. One other thing worth mentioning at this point about variables, is to consider the following shell script:


#!/bin/sh
echo "What is your name?"
read USER_NAME
echo "Hello $USER_NAME"
echo "I will create you a file called $USER_NAME_file"
touch $USER_NAME_file

Think about what result you would expect. For example, if you enter "steve" as your USER_NAME, should the script create steve_file?
Actually, no. This will cause an error unless there is a variable called USER_NAME_file. The shell does not know where the variable ends and the rest starts. How can we define this?
The answer is, that we enclose the variable itself in curly brackets:


user.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo "What is your name?"
read USER_NAME
echo "Hello $USER_NAME"
echo "I will create you a file called ${USER_NAME}_file"
touch "${USER_NAME}_file"

The shell now knows that we are referring to the variable USER_NAME and that we want it suffixed with _file. This can be the downfall of many a new shell script programmer, as the source of the problem can be difficult to track down.

Also note the quotes around "${USER_NAME}_file" - if the user entered "Steve Parker" (note the space) then without the quotes, the arguments passed to touch would be Steve and Parker_file - that is, we'd effectively be saying touch Steve Parker_file, which is two files to be touched, not one. The quotes avoid this. Thanks to Chris for highlighting this.

5. Wildcards

Wildcards are really nothing new if you have used Unix at all before.
It is not necessarily obvious how they are useful in shell scripts though. This section is really just to get the old grey cells thinking how things look when you're in a shell script - predicting what the effect of using different syntaxes are. This will be used later on, particularly in the Loops section.
Think first how you would copy all the files from /tmp/a into /tmp/b. All the .txt files? All the .html files?
Hopefully you will have come up with:
$ cp /tmp/a/* /tmp/b/
$ cp /tmp/a/*.txt /tmp/b/
$ cp /tmp/a/*.html /tmp/b/
Now how would you list the files in /tmp/a/ without using ls /tmp/a/?
How about echo /tmp/a/*? What are the two key differences between this and the ls output? How can this be useful? Or a hinderance?
How could you rename all .txt files to .bak? Note that
$ mv *.txt *.bak

will not have the desired effect; think about how this gets expanded by the shell before it is passed to mv. Try this using echo instead of mv if this helps.
We will look into this further later on, as it uses a few concepts not yet covered.

6. Escape Characters

Certain characters are significant to the shell; we have seen, for example, that the use of double quotes (") characters affect how spaces and TAB characters are treated, for example:

$ echo Hello       World
Hello World
$ echo "Hello World"
Hello World

So how do we display: Hello    "World" ?

$ echo "Hello   \"World\""

The first and last " characters wrap the whole lot into one parameter passed to echo so that the spacing between the two words is kept as is. But the code:

$ echo "Hello   " World ""

would be interpreted as three parameters:

  • "Hello   "
  • World
  • ""

So the output would be

Hello    World

Note that we lose the quotes entirely. This is because the first and second quotes mark off the Hello and following spaces; the second argument is an unquoted "World" and the third argument is the empty string; "".

Thanks to Patrick for pointing out that this:

$ echo "Hello   "World""
is actually only one parameter (no spaces between the quoted parameters), and that you can test this by replacing the echo command with (for example) ls.

Most characters (*, ', etc) are not interpreted (ie, they are taken literally) by means of placing them in double quotes (""). They are taken as is and passed on to the command being called. An example using the asterisk (*) goes:

$ echo *
case.shtml escape.shtml first.shtml
functions.shtml hints.shtml index.shtml
ip-primer.txt raid1+0.txt
$ echo *txt
ip-primer.txt raid1+0.txt
$ echo "*"
*
$ echo "*txt"
*txt

In the first example, * is expanded to mean all files in the current directory.
In the second example, *txt means all files ending in txt.
In the third, we put the * in double quotes, and it is interpreted literally.
In the fourth example, the same applies, but we have appended txt to the string.

However, ", $, `, and \ are still interpreted by the shell, even when they're in double quotes.
The backslash (\) character is used to mark these special characters so that they are not interpreted by the shell, but passed on to the command being run (for example, echo).
So to output the string: (Assuming that the value of $X is 5):

A quote is ", backslash is \, backtick is `.
A few spaces are ; dollar is $. $X is 5.

we would have to write:

$ echo "A quote is \", backslash is \\, backtick is \`."
A quote is ", backslash is \, backtick is `.
$ echo "A few spaces are ; dollar is \$. \$X is ${X}."
A few spaces are ; dollar is $. $X is 5.

We have seen why the " is special for preserving spacing. Dollar is special because it marks a variable, so $X is replaced by the shell with the contents of the variable X. Backslash is special because it is itself used to mark other characters off; we need the following options for a complete shell:

$ echo "This is \\ a backslash"
This is \ a backslash
$ echo "This is \" a quote and this is \\ a backslash"
This is " a quote and this is \ a backslash

So backslash itself must be escaped to show that it is to be taken literally. The other special character, the backtick, is discussed later in External Programs.

7. Loops

Most languages have the concept of loops: If we want to repeat a task twenty times, we don't want to have to type in the code twenty times, with maybe a slight change each time.
As a result, we have for and while loops in the Bourne shell. This is somewhat fewer features than other languages, but nobody claimed that shell programming has the power of C.

For Loops

for loops iterate through a set of values until the list is exhausted:


for.sh
#!/bin/sh
for i in 1 2 3 4 5
do
  echo "Looping ... number $i"
done

Try this code and see what it does. Note that the values can be anything at all:


for2.sh
#!/bin/sh
for i in hello 1 * 2 goodbye
do
  echo "Looping ... i is set to $i"
done

is well worth trying. Make sure that you understand what is happening here. Try it without the * and grasp the idea, then re-read the Wildcards section and try it again with the * in place. Try it also in different directories, and with the * surrounded by double quotes, and try it preceded by a backslash (\*)

In case you don't have access to a shell at the moment (it is very useful to have a shell to hand whilst reading this tutorial), the results of the above two scripts are:

Looping .... number 1
Looping .... number 2
Looping .... number 3
Looping .... number 4
Looping .... number 5

and, for the second example:

Looping ... i is set to hello
Looping ... i is set to 1
Looping ... i is set to (name of first file in current directory)
    ... etc ...
Looping ... i is set to (name of last file in current directory)
Looping ... i is set to 2
Looping ... i is set to goodbye

So, as you can see, for simply loops through whatever input it is given, until it runs out of input.

While Loops

while loops can be much more fun! (depending on your idea of fun, and how often you get out of the house... )


while.sh
#!/bin/sh
INPUT_STRING=hello
while [ "$INPUT_STRING" != "bye" ]
do
  echo "Please type something in (bye to quit)"
  read INPUT_STRING
  echo "You typed: $INPUT_STRING"
done

What happens here, is that the echo and read statements will run indefinitely until you type "bye" when prompted.
Review Variables - Part I to see why we set INPUT_STRING=hello before testing it. This makes it a repeat loop, not a traditional while loop.


The colon (:) always evaluates to true; whilst using this can be necessary sometimes, it is often preferrable to use a real exit condition. Compare quitting the above loop with the one below; see which is the more elegant. Also think of some situations in which each one would be more useful than the other:


while2.sh
#!/bin/sh
while :
do
  echo "Please type something in (^C to quit)"
  read INPUT_STRING
  echo "You typed: $INPUT_STRING"
done

Another useful trick is the while read f loop. This example uses the case statement, which we'll cover later. It reads from the file myfile, and for each line, tells you what language it thinks is being used. Each line must end with a LF (newline) - if cat myfile doesn't end with a blank line, that final line will not be processed.


while3a.sh
#!/bin/sh
while read f
do
  case $f in
        hello)          echo English    ;;
        howdy)          echo American   ;;
        gday)           echo Australian ;;
        bonjour)        echo French     ;;
        "guten tag")    echo German     ;;
        *)              echo Unknown Language: $f
                ;;
   esac
done < myfile

On many Unix systems, this can be also be done as:


while3b.sh
#!/bin/sh
while f=`line`
do
  .. process f ..
done < myfile

But since the while read f works with any *nix, and doesn't depend on the external program line, the former is preferable. See External Programs to see why this method uses the backtick (`).
Had I referred to $i (not $f) in the default ("Unknown Language") case above - you will get no warnings or errors in this case, even though $i has not been declared or defined. For example:

$ i=THIS_IS_A_BUG
$ export i
$ ./while3.sh something
Unknown Language: THIS_IS_A_BUG
$

So make sure that you avoid typos. This is also another good reason for using ${x} and not just $x - if x="A" and you want to say "A1", you need echo ${x}1, as echo $x1 will try to use the variable x1, which may not exist, or may be set to B2.


I recently found an old thread on Usenet which I had been involved in, where I actually learned more ... Google has it here..


A handy Bash (but not Bourne Shell) tip I learned recently from the Linux From Scratch project is:

mkdir rc{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,S}.d

instead of the more cumbersome:

for runlevel in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 S
do
  mkdir rc${runlevel}.d
done

And this can be done recursively, too:

$ cd /
$ ls -ld {,usr,usr/local}/{bin,sbin,lib}
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Oct 26 01:00 /bin
drwxr-xr-x    6 root     root         4096 Jan 16 17:09 /lib
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Oct 27 00:02 /sbin
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root        40960 Jan 16 19:35 usr/bin
drwxr-xr-x   83 root     root        49152 Jan 16 17:23 usr/lib
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Jan 16 22:22 usr/local/bin
drwxr-xr-x    3 root     root         4096 Jan 16 19:17 usr/local/lib
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         4096 Dec 28 00:44 usr/local/sbin
drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         8192 Dec 27 02:10 usr/sbin

We will use while loops further in the Test and Case sections.

8. Test

Test is used by virtually every shell script written. It may not seem that way, because test is not often called directly. test is more frequently called as [. [ is a symbolic link to test, just to make shell programs more readable. If is also normally a shell builtin (which means that the shell itself will interpret [ as meaning test, even if your Unix environment is set up differently):

$ type [
[ is a shell builtin
$ which [
/usr/bin/[
$ ls -l /usr/bin/[
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Mar 27 2000 /usr/bin/[ -> test

This means that '[' is actually a program, just like ls and other programs, so it must be surrounded by spaces:

if [$foo == "bar" ]

will not work; it is interpreted as if test$foo == "bar" ], which is a ']' without a beginning '['. Put spaces around all your operators I've highlighted the mandatory spaces with the word 'SPACE' - replace 'SPACE' with an actual space; if there isn't a space there, it won't work:

if SPACE [ SPACE "$foo" SPACE == SPACE "bar" SPACE ]

Test is a simple but powerful comparison utility. For full details, run man test on your system, but here are some usages and typical examples.

Test is most often invoked indirectly via the if and while statements. It is also the reason you will come into difficulties if you create a program called test and try to run it, as this shell builtin will be called instead of your program!
The syntax for if...then...else... is:

if [ ... ]
then
  # if-code
else
  # else-code
fi

Note that fi is if backwards! This is used again later with case and esac.
Also, be aware of the syntax - the "if [ ... ]" and the "then" commands must be on different lines. Alternatively, the semicolon ";" can separate them:

if [ ... ]; then
  # do something
fi

You can also use the elif, like this:

if  [ something ]; then
 echo "Something"
 elif [ something_else ]; then
   echo "Something else"
 else
   echo "None of the above"
fi

This will echo "Something" if the [ something ] test succeeds, otherwise it will test [ something_else ], and echo "Something else" if that succeeds. If all else fails, it will echo "None of the above".

Try the following code snippet, before running it set the variable X to various values (try -1, 0, 1, hello, bye, etc). You can do this as follows (thanks to Dave for pointing out the need to export the variable, as noted in Variables - Part I.):

$ X=5
$ export X
$ ./test.sh
  ... output of test.sh ...
$ X=hello
$ ./test.sh
  ... output of test.sh ...
$ X=test.sh
$ ./test.sh
  ... output of test.sh ...

Then try it again, with $X as the name of an existing file, such as /etc/hosts.


test.sh
#!/bin/sh
if [ "$X" -lt "0" ]
then
  echo "X is less than zero"
fi
if [ "$X" -gt "0" ]; then
  echo "X is more than zero"
fi
[ "$X" -le "0" ] && \
      echo "X is less than or equal to  zero"
[ "$X" -ge "0" ] && \
      echo "X is more than or equal to zero"
[ "$X" = "0" ] && \
      echo "X is the string or number \"0\""
[ "$X" = "hello" ] && \
      echo "X matches the string \"hello\""
[ "$X" != "hello" ] && \
      echo "X is not the string \"hello\""
[ -n "$X" ] && \
      echo "X is of nonzero length"
[ -f "$X" ] && \
      echo "X is the path of a real file" || \
      echo "No such file: $X"
[ -x "$X" ] && \
      echo "X is the path of an executable file"
[ "$X" -nt "/etc/passwd" ] && \
      echo "X is a file which is newer than /etc/passwd"

Note that we can use the semicolon (;) to join two lines together. This is often done to save a bit of space in simple if statements. The backslash simply tells the shell that this is not the end of the line, but the two (or more) lines should be treated as one. This is useful for readability. It is customary to indent the following line.

As we see from these examples, test can perform many tests on numbers, strings, and filenames.

 

Thanks to Aaron for pointing out that -a, -e (both meaning "file exists"), -S (file is a Socket), -nt (file is newer than), -ot (file is older than), -ef (paths refer to the same file) and -O (file is owned my user), are not available in the traditional Bourne shell (eg, /bin/sh on Solaris, AIX, HPUX, etc).

There is a simpler way of writing if statements: The && and || commands give code to run if the result is true.

#!/bin/sh
[ $X -ne 0 ] && echo "X isn't zero" || echo "X is zero"
[ -f $X ] && echo "X is a file" || echo "X is not a file"
[ -n $X ] && echo "X is of non-zero length" || \
     echo "X is of zero length"

This syntax is possible because there is a file (or shell-builtin) called [ which is linked to test. Be careful using this construct, though, as overuse can lead to very hard-to-read code. The if...then...else... structure is much more readable. Use of the [...] construct is recommended for while loops and trivial sanity checks with which you do not want to overly distract the reader.

Note that when you set X to a non-numeric value, the first few comparisons result in the message:

test.sh: [: integer expression expected before -lt
test.sh: [: integer expression expected before -gt
test.sh: [: integer expression expected before -le
test.sh: [: integer expression expected before -ge
This is because the -lt, -gt, -le, -ge, comparisons are only designed for integers, and do not work on strings. The string comparisons, such as != will happily treat "5" as a string, but there is no sensible way of treating "Hello" as an integer, so the integer comparisons complain.
If you want your shell script to behave more gracefully, you will have to check the contents of the variable before you test it - maybe something like this:
echo -en "Please guess the magic number: "
read X
echo $X | grep "[^0-9]" > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ "$?" -eq "0" ]; then
  # If the grep found something other than 0-9
  # then it's not an integer.
  echo "Sorry, wanted a number"
else
  # The grep found only 0-9, so it's an integer.
  # We can safely do a test on it.
  if [ "$X" == "7" ]; then
    echo "You entered the magic number!"
  fi
fi

In this way you can echo a more meaningful message to the user, and exit gracefully. The $? variable is explained in Variables - Part II, and grep is a complicated beast, so here goes: grep [0-9] finds lines of text which contain digits (0-9) and possibly other characters, so the caret (^) in grep [^0-9] finds only those lines which don't consist only of numbers. We can then take the opposite (by acting on failure, not success). Okay? The >/dev/null 2>&1 directs any output or errors to the special "null" device, instead of going to the user's screen.
Many thanks to Paul Schermerhorn for correcting me - this page used to claim that grep -v [0-9] would work, but this is clearly far too simplistic.

We can use test in while loops as follows:


test2.sh
#!/bin/sh
X=0
while [ -n "$X" ]
do
  echo "Enter some text (RETURN to quit)"
  read X
  echo "You said: $X"
done

This code will keep asking for input until you hit RETURN (X is zero length). Thanks to Justin Heath for pointing out that the script didn't work - I'd missed out the quotes around $X in the while [ -n "$X" ]. Without those quotes, there is nothing to test when $X is empty.
Alexander Weber has pointed out that running this script will end untidily:

$ ./test2.sh
Enter some text (RETURN to quit)
fred
You said: fred
Enter some text (RETURN to quit)
wilma
You said: wilma
Enter some text (RETURN to quit)

You said:
$

This can be tidied up with another test within the loop:

#!/bin/sh
X=0
while [ -n "$X" ]
do
  echo "Enter some text (RETURN to quit)"
  read X
  if [ -n "$X" ]; then
    echo "You said: $X"
  fi
done

Note also that I've used two different syntaxes for if statements on this page. These are:

if [ "$X" -lt "0" ]
then
  echo "X is less than zero"
fi

..........  and  ........

if [ ! -n "$X" ]; then
  echo "You said: $X"
fi

You must have a break between the if statement and the then construct. This can be a semicolon or a newline, it doesn't matter which, but there must be one or the other between the if and the then. It would be nice to just say:

if [ ! -n "$X" ]
  echo "You said: $X"

but the then and fi are absolutely required.

9. Case

The case statement saves going through a whole set of if .. then .. else statements. Its syntax is really quite simple:
talk.sh
#!/bin/sh

echo "Please talk to me ..."
while :
do
  read INPUT_STRING
  case $INPUT_STRING in
        hello)
                echo "Hello yourself!"
                ;;
        bye)
                echo "See you again!"
                break
                ;;
        *)
                echo "Sorry, I don't understand"
                ;;
  esac
done
echo
echo "That's all folks!"


Okay, so it's not the best conversationalist in the world; it's only an example!

Try running it and check how it works...

$ ./talk.sh
Please talk to me ...
hello
Hello yourself!
What do you think of politics?
Sorry, I don't understand
bye
See you again!

That's all folks!
$

The syntax is quite simple:
The case line itself is always of the same format, and it means that we are testing the value of the variable INPUT_STRING.


The options we understand are then listed and followed by a right bracket, as hello) and bye).
This means that if INPUT_STRING matches hello then that section of code is executed, up to the double semicolon.
If INPUT_STRING matches bye then the goodbye message is printed and the loop exits. Note that if we wanted to exit the script completely then we would use the command exit instead of break.
The third option here, the *), is the default catch-all condition; it is not required, but is often useful for debugging purposes even if we think we know what values the test variable will have.

The whole case statement is ended with esac (case backwards!) then we end the while loop with a done.

That's about as complicated as case conditions get, but they can be a very useful and powerful tool. They are often used to parse the parameters passed to a shell script, amongst other uses.

10. Variables - Part II

There are a set of variables which are set for you already, and most of these cannot have values assigned to them.
These can contain useful information, which can be used by the script to know about the environment in which it is running.

The first set of variables we will look at are $0 .. $9 and $#.
The variable $0 is the basename of the program as it was called.
$1 .. $9 are the first 9 additional parameters the script was called with.
The variable $@ is all parameters $1 .. whatever. The variable $*, is similar, but does not preserve any whitespace, and quoting, so "File with spaces" becomes "File" "with" "spaces". This is similar to the echo stuff we looked at in A First Script. As a general rule, use $@ and avoid $*.
$# is the number of parameters the script was called with.
Let's take an example script:


var3.sh
echo "All parameters are $@"

Let's look at running this code and see the output:

$ /home/steve/var3.sh
I was called with 0 parameters
My name is /home/steve/var3.sh
My first parameter is
My second parameter is    
All parameters are
$
$ ./var3.sh hello world earth
I was called with 3 parameters
My name is ./var3.sh
My first parameter is hello
My second parameter is world
All parameters are hello world earth
Note that the value of $0 changes depending on how the script was called. The external utility basename can help tidy this up:
echo "My name is `basename $0`"
$# and $1 .. $2 are set automatically by the shell.
We can take more than 9 parameters by using the shift command; look at the script below:
var4.sh
#!/bin/sh
while [ "$#" -gt "0" ]
do
  echo "\$1 is $1"
  shift
done              

This script keeps on using shift until $# is down to zero, at which point the list is empty.

Another special variable is $?. This contains the exit value of the last run command. So the code:


#!/bin/sh
/usr/local/bin/my-command
if [ "$?" -ne "0" ]; then
  echo "Sorry, we had a problem there!"
fi

will attempt to run /usr/local/bin/my-command which should exit with a value of zero if all went well, or a nonzero value on failure. We can then handle this by checking the value of $? after calling the command. This helps make scripts robust and more intelligent.
Well-behaved applications should return zero on success. Hence the quote:

One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C Programs. (Robert Firth)

The other two main variables set for you by the environment are $$ and $!. These are both process numbers.
The $$ variable is the PID (Process IDentifier) of the currently running shell. This can be useful for creating temporary files, such as /tmp/my-script.$$ which is useful if many instances of the script could be run at the same time, and they all need their own temporary files.
The $! variable is the PID of the last run background process. This is useful to keep track of the process as it gets on with its job.

Another interesting variable is IFS. This is the Internal Field Separator. The default value is SPACE TAB NEWLINE, but if you are changing it, it's easier to take a copy, as shown:


var5.sh
#!/bin/sh
old_IFS="$IFS"
IFS=:
echo "Please input three data separated by colons ..."
read x y z
IFS=$old_IFS
echo "x is $x y is $y z is $z"

This script runs like this:

$ ./ifs.sh
Please input some data separated by colons ...
hello:how are you:today
x is hello y is how are you z is today

It is important when dealing with IFS in particular (but any variable not entirely under your control) to realise that it could contain spaces, newlines and other "uncontrollable" characters. It is therefore a very good idea to use double-quotes around it, ie: old_IFS="$IFS" instead of old_IFS=$IFS.

Advertising 3

Donate

Donate to keep shellmix alive


PayPal


Info BOX

Vote on shellmix !!!!

Free Shell Accounts - the biggest list on the net :-)

Who's Online

We have 1181 guests online

FaceShit info page if server is down 

name=